Yi Zhou vs Alan Magadan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Jun at 06:37 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Y. Zhou vs A. Magadan

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

MEX
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Zhou 1 - 0 Magadan
They have played 2 sets in total, with Yi Zhou winning 2 and Alan Magadan winning 0. The last match between Yi Zhou and Alan Magadan was at the M25 Wichita, 11-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Yi Zhou getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Zhou | 1 |
| Magadan | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Wichita(06-11-25)
Y. Zhou vs A. Magadan H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $75,950 | Career Prize Money | $9,545 |
| 48.15% (65-70) | Career Total W/L | 50.60% (42-41) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 33.33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
Y. Zhou vs A. Magadan Match Preview:
- Recent performance indicates Zhou excels in second serve, winning 49.22% of points compared to Magadan's 40.63%. Does this suggest a stronger serve performance? Yes, Zhou appears more consistent in this area.
- Return game statistics show that Zhou leads slightly with a first serve return win rate of 29.24%, marginally higher than Magadan's 28.77%. Zhou also captures a larger share of second serve return points at 45.24% versus Magadan's 42.41%.
- Under pressure, Zhou has saved 52.9% of breakpoints, while Magadan trails at 45.9%. Is Zhou generally more adept at handling critical moments? Data suggests so.
- Magadan displays a higher match win rate over the past year at 62.86%, compared to Zhou's 51.92%. However, opponent rank analysis shows Zhou has faced tougher competitors (average rank of 408.87) than Magadan (average rank of 277.54).
- Evaluating surface preferences, Zhou performs best on Hard courts (49% win rate), while Magadan's highest success has been on Indoor Hard surfaces (70% win rate).
- The level of events played implies both participated largely at the ITF $10K level, with Zhou winning 70.83% of matches and Magadan achieving a win percentage of 64.29%.
- In deciding sets, Zhou has shown slightly better resilience, winning 28% compared to Magadan’s 20%.
- Magadan converts breakpoints more effectively, succeeding in 43.33% of instances, whereas Zhou converts 30% of their opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):
Considering the available statistics, Zhou exhibits stronger recent performance in second serve success and return games, indicating a possible edge in maintaining rallies and countering opponent serves.
Magadan surpasses Zhou in overall match win rate and is highly efficient at converting breakpoints, suggesting they can capitalize heavily on opportunities to break service games.
While Magadan's best surface is Indoor Hard, the current event surface could shift the dynamic if it does not align with their preference. Zhou’s slightly better figures in critical moments under pressure may play a significant role if the match is closely contested, especially considering their experience against higher-ranked players.
Ultimately, given the statistics and the range of factors considered, Zhou appears to have a slight advantage in this upcoming match.
Yi Zhou vs Alan Magadan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Y. Zhou vs A. Magadan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 0:57:52 | Average Match Time | 0:57:52 |
| 79% (34/43) | 1st Serve % | 59% (24/41) |
| 74% (25/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (17/24) |
| 67% (6/9) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (9/17) |
| 33% (2/6) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/5) |
| 37% (15/41) | Return Points Win % | 28% (12/43) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
Y. Zhou Recent Matches Played
A. Magadan Recent Matches Played

Y. Zhou vs A. Magadan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48.15% (65/70) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.60% (42/41) |
| 49.53% (157/160) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.59% (101/84) |
| 50.07% (1521/1517) | Games Win/Loss | 51.09% (847/811) |
| 50.39% (64/63) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.76% (32/35) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 69.23% (9/4) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 657 | Aces Total | 194 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 335 | Total Double Faults | 203 |
| 1:42:2 | Average Match Time | 1:16:33 |
| 398.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 310.94 |
| 60% (5564/9248) | 1st Serve % | 56% (2181/3901) |
| 69% (3857/5564) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (1518/2181) |
| 51% (1868/3684) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (836/1720) |
| 41% (338/826) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (150/355) |
| 38% (3458/8997) | Return Points Win % | 38% (1504/3923) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25.00% (2/6) | Main Tour W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 44.83% (26/32) | Challenger W/L | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 57.14% (36/27) | Futures W/L | 50.70% (36/35) |
| 47% (61/131) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (42/82) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 40% (19/48) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 73% (16/22) |
| 36% (17/47) | Deciding Set Win % | 11% (2/18) |
| 76% (67/51) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (48/40) |
| 24% (67/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (48/8) |
| 19% (68/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (35/2) |